MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2574824619 · doi:10.1080/10402381.2016.1264513

Preliminary investigation of lake-use patterns in prairie lakes, stakeholder perceptions, and resulting management implications

2017· article· en· W2574824619 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lushani Nanayakkara, Björn Wissel

Bibliographic record

VenueLake and Reservoir Management · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Environment - SaskatchewanUniversity of Regina
KeywordsOverfishingGeographyWildlifeFisheryFishingRecreationUrbanizationEcologyEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanayakkara L, Wissel B. 2017. Preliminary investigation of lake-use patterns in prairie lakes, stakeholder perceptions, and resulting management implications. Lake Reserv Manage. 49:49–61.To better understand use and perception of lakes in the prairie region of North America, we distributed 200 lake-use and management surveys at 9 lakes in southern Saskatchewan, Canada, during 2013 and received 65 responses. Survey results indicate recreational uses such as angling, swimming, and boating were most common. Anglers targeted walleye ∼3 times more than other taxa such as northern pike (Esox lucius) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens), and consumption or catch-and-release was based on species and size. Overall, pollution of waterbodies (76% of responses) and overfishing (60% of responses) were stated as issues of highest concern in response to an open-ended question, but results varied among user groups. When asked to rank a set of issues potentially related to lake health, urbanization ranked above both agriculture and climate change. Only about half of respondents had a general understanding of eutrophication and food-web composition, and anglers were unconcerned about overfishing and had little concern for critical matters such as climate change and invasive species. These results indicate a possible decoupling between science and public perception about anthropogenic influences on lake ecosystems in southern Saskatchewan prairie lakes. Importantly, 60% of respondents stated an interest in lake management involvement. Monitoring and committee participation garnered the most interest. Based on our results, scientific findings and future threats to lakes need to be better communicated to the public to successfully adapt to and mitigate the effects of important issues. Ultimately, enhanced science communication with stakeholders may increase citizen science involvement in lake monitoring and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLake and Reservoir ManagementSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207