MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2574839646 · doi:10.1109/icsens.2016.7808496

Multi-functional capacitive proximity sensing system for industrial safety applications

2016· article· en· W2574839646 on OpenAlexaff
Fan Xia, Behraad Bahreyni, Fabio Campi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitive sensingComputer scienceSupport vector machineArtificial intelligenceCapacitanceProximity sensorCapacitorComputer visionMatrix (chemical analysis)Electronic engineeringEngineeringElectrodeElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a capacitive sensing system, addressing the issue of collision avoidance in partially modelled or unknown robot-assisted industrial environment by means of object distance measurement, motion tracking, and surface profile detection. The sensor consists of a mesh of multiple electrodes, a digital control module, a capacitance to digital converter, and a data processing module. The mesh is composed of 16 metal squares organized to form a 4×4 capacitor matrix. The electrode connections within the matrix can be reconfigured at run time by the digital control logic to provide multiple sense functionalities. Statistical regression models are applied to derive the distance and track the motion. A machine learning algorithm (Support Vector Machine, SVM) is applied to measured data to classify surface profiles. The fabricated sensing system has the ability of detecting objects at distances up to 20 cm from the sensor, and shows accuracy over 90% in profile recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207