MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2575104018 · doi:10.12697/sv.2015.6.145-153

Ühe peniku taasloomise lugu / Recreating a Penik (a Form of Head Decoration)

2015· article· en· W2575104018 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maaja Kalle

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia Vernacula · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead (geology)PopularityQuarter (Canadian coin)Order (exchange)Visual artsArtArt historyHistoryArchaeologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A penik decorated with woven trim (galloons), known as 'kard-penik', has been worn in Hiiumaa as part of folk costumes. The examples in the collections of Estonian National Museum have been dated to the 1st quarter of the 19th century. In earlier times all girls wore a penik while attending church. In later times, it was used as a headpiece by the brides in Hiiu county, and also by bridesmaids in Emmaste and Käina. By the end of the 19th century, the tradition of wearing peniks started to disappear due to the growing popularity of Myrtus head chains. The author of this article has focused mainly on the materials and the possible techniques used to make peniks in order to recreate the item and to describe the process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia VernaculaSame topicArt, Politics, and ModernismFrench-language works237,207