MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2575134457 · doi:10.22621/cfn.v118i1.869

"Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada: Second Edition" by Henry A. Gleason and Arthur Cronquist. 2004. [book review]

2004· article· en· W2575134457 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
William J. Cody

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

numbers 142 and 145, each map was deficient.Two specific examples are (1) reference 142, titled Albatrellus in Michigan, includes A. caeruleoporus, A. confluens, A. cristatus and A. peckianus but Michigan is not shaded on the maps for those species, and (2) shading on the map for Sistotrema confluens covers southern Quebec and Nova Scotia but reference 145 notes its presence in those provinces as well as in Michigan, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont and Wisconsin.Two new species, Auricularia americana Parm.et I. Parm.ex Audet, Boulet et Sirard and Polyporus longiporus Audet, Boulet et Sirard, are proposed.Several species are reported for the first time in North America, for example, Antrodiella pallasii, Postia alni, P. folliculocystidiata, P. ptychogaster, Phellinus cinereus and Polyporus tubaeformis.Although two names, Postia minisculoides and P. subpendula, are proposed as new combinations, if their basionyms, i.e., the initial name

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.018
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1130.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207