MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2575371978 · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1554107

A Feasibility Study of Cell Injection Therapy in Human Intervertebral Discs Cultured under Dynamic Load

2015· article· en· W2575371978 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lisbet Haglund, Derek H. Rosenzweig, Janet Moir, David Eglin, Michael H. Weber, Jean Ouellet, Thomas Steffen

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Spine Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEx vivoContext (archaeology)Intervertebral discChondrogenesisMedicineLumbarHyaluronic acidDegenerative disc diseaseRegeneration (biology)Degeneration (medical)Viability assayIn vivoTransplantationTissue engineeringBiomedical engineeringCartilagePathologyAnatomySurgeryCellCell biologyBiologyBiotechnologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Painful IVD degeneration affects the quality of life for millions of people, and it presents a major problem for direct and indirect global health care costs. A preclinical ex vivo screening platform is needed to study the relationship between mechanobiology, disc matrix composition, and metabolism in the context of degenerative disease. We therefore developed an ex vivo organ culture model that facilitates culture of intact human discs in a controlled dynamically loaded environment. The bioreactor is used in combination with a previously reported harvesting method, which maintains the integrity of the intervertebral discs by preserving the noncalcified part of the cartilage end plate and the entire annulus. Here, we determine IVD tissue integrity and cell viability in the system, and investigate the suitability toward cell supplementation for tissue repair. Methods A total of nine lumbar IVDs from seven individual donors were obtained through organ donations via Transplant Québec. The spines were assessed by X-ray to evaluate degree of degeneration and six discs were isolated from four donors as previously described. Overall, 10 6 primary fluorescently labeled allogeneic NP cells from three separate donors were seeded per 1 mL of thermogelling hyaluronic acid hydrogel (HA-pNIPAM). Approximately, 250 µL of cell/gel mixtures were injected laterally into the NP region of isolated discs. IVDs with the newly transplanted cells were transferred to the bioreactors and were loaded with 0.1 to 0.6 MPa cyclic loads for two periods of 2 hours/day. The dynamic compressive load periods were interrupted by recovery periods of 6 hours and 14 hours, respectively, under 0.1 MPa static loads. The scheme was repeated for 3 or 7 or 14 consecutive days. After loading, portions of nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus were excised and analyzed via LIVE/DEAD assay, and smaller sections were visualized using a laser-scanning confocal microscope. The proportion of viable cells was quantified. Results Our culture system maintains > 80% cell viability of the resident IVD cells and shows no signs of adverse effects in the extracellular matrix after more than 14 days of dynamic culture. Allogeneic NP cells were successfully transplanted in freshly isolated human discs. The transplanted cells were found dispersed throughout the nuclear and annular regions and displayed maintained viability after up to 14 days of dynamic culture. Conclusion This study shows that it is feasible to culture human IVDs under dynamic loading for more than 14 days while maintaining cell viability, tissue homeostasis, and integrity. It also presents a preclinical ex vivo screening platform where cell-based therapies, utilizing isolated disc cells or stem cells can be tested in combination with various injectable hydrogels. In addition, the effect of load magnitude and frequency, growth factors, O 2 tension, glucose levels, and bioactive therapeutics can be evaluated. The bioreactor can also be used to evaluate loss or gain of mechanical function as a result of biological changes. Such knowledge is important for determining the value of cell/hydrogel injections and patient advisement on physical activities following a biological repair procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Spine JournalSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207