Acquisition of Anion Profiles and Diffusion Coefficients in the Opalinus Clay at the Mont Terri Rock Laboratory (Switzerland)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chloride, bromide and sulphate concentration profiles have been analysed through the Opalinus Clay of Mont Terri in the framework of the Deep Borehole Experiment. Aqueous leaching and out diffusion experiments were carried out to acquire anion concentrations and estimate pore diffusion coefficients. Out diffusion technique gave consistent values of chloride and bromide compared to the concentration profiles acquired so far at the tunnel level of the Mont Terri rock laboratory. Concentrations acquired by leaching experiments show a maximum chloride concentration of 16.1 ± 1.7g/l at the basal part of Opalinus Clay which is higher than the value of 14.4 ± 1.4g/l obtained by out diffusion at the same level. This excess of chloride is likely due to dissolution of Cl − bearing minerals or release of Cl initially contained in unaccessible porosity. Bromide to chloride ratios are virtually the same as that of seawater, whereas sulphate to chloride ratios are significantly higher. Those latter are probably due to pyrite oxidation and dissolution of sulphate-bearing minerals occurring during sample collection and preparation. An anisotropy ratio of 2.4 was estimated for pore diffusion coefficient in the Opalinus Clay sandy facies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".