Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud radio access networks (C-RANs) provide a promising architecture for the future mobile networks needed to sustain the exponential growth of the data rate. In C-RAN, one data processing center or baseband unit communicates with users through distributed remote radio heads, which are connected to the baseband unit (BBU) via high-capacity low-latency so-called fronthaul links. The architecture of C-RAN, however, imposes a burden of fronthaul bandwidth because raw I/Q samples are exchanged between the RRHs and the BBU. Therefore, signal compression is required on fronthaul links owing to their limited capacity. This chapter exploits the advance of joint signal processing to reduce the transmission rate on fronthaul uplinks. In particular, we first propose a joint decompression and detection (JDD) algorithm which exploits the correlation among RRHs and jointly performs decompressing and detecting. The JDD algorithm takes into consideration both fading and quantization effects in a single decoding step. Second, the block error rate of the JDD algorithm is analyzed in a closed form by using pairwise error probability analysis under both deterministic and Rayleigh fading channel models. Third, on the basis of the analyzed block error rate (BLER), we introduce adaptive compression schemes subject to quality of service constraints to minimize the fronthaul transmission rate while satisfying the predefined target QoS. The premise of the proposed compression methods originates from practical scenarios, where most applications tolerate a non-zero BLER. As a dual problem, we also develop a scheme to minimize the signal distortion subject to the fronthaul rate constraint. We finally consider the counterparts of these two adaptive compression schemes for Rayleigh-fading channels and analyze their asymptotic behavior as the constraints approach extremes. Introduction Cloud radio access networks have been widely accepted as a new architecture for future mobile networks to sustain the ever increasing demand in the data rate [1]. In a C-RAN, one centralized processor or BBU communicates with users distributed in a graphical area via a number of remote radio heads (RRHs), which act as “soft” relaying nodes and are connected to the BBU via high-capacity and low-latency fronthaul links. By moving all baseband processing functions from RRHs to a centralized processor, the C-RAN enables adaptive load balancing via a virtual base station pool [2] and effective network-wide inter-cell interference management thanks to multi-cell processing [3, 4].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".