<i>The Search for Good Government: Understanding the Paradox of Italian Democracy</i>. By Filippo Sabetti (Montreal, McGill-Queens University Press, 2000) 313 pp. $34.95
Bibliographic record
Abstract
October 01 2001 The Search for Good Government: Understanding the Paradox of Italian Democracy The Search for Good Government: Understanding the Paradox of Italian Democracy. By FilippoSabetti (Montreal, McGill-Queens University Press, 2000) 313 pp. $34.95 Raymond Grew Raymond Grew University of Michigan Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Raymond Grew University of Michigan Online ISSN: 1530-9169 Print ISSN: 0022-1953 © 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the editors of The Journal of Interdisciplinary History2001 The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2001) 32 (2): 302–303. https://doi.org/10.1162/002219501750442558 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Raymond Grew; The Search for Good Government: Understanding the Paradox of Italian Democracy. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2001; 32 (2): 302–303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/002219501750442558 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the editors of The Journal of Interdisciplinary History2001 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".