MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2575838082 · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2017.01.038

Introducing global peat-specific temperature and pH calibrations based on brGDGT bacterial lipids

2017· article· en· W2575838082 on OpenAlexfundno aff
B. David A. Naafs, Gordon N. Inglis, Yanhong Zheng, Matt Amesbury, Harald Biester, Richard Bindler, Jerome Blewett, Mark Burrows, Dennis Del Castillo Torres, Frank M. Chambers, Arthur D. Cohen, Richard P. Evershed, Sarah J. Feakins, Mariusz Gałka, Angela Gallego‐Sala, Laure Gandois, Dennis M. Gray, Patrick G. Hatcher, Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, Paul Hughes, Arnaud Huguet, Mari Könönen, Fatima Laggoun‐Défarge, Outi Lähteenoja, Mariusz Lamentowicz, Rob Marchant, Erin L. McClymont, Xabier Pontevedra‐Pombal, Camilo Ponton, Ali Pourmand, Anthony M. Rizzuti, Line Rochefort, Judith Schellekens, François De Vleeschouwer, Richard D. Pancost

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNatural Environment Research CouncilLabexConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSight Research UKAgence Nationale de la RechercheLabex DRIIHM
KeywordsPeatEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Analysis of brGDGT distributions in global peat dataset. • Correlation of brGDGT distributions with peat pH and mean annual air temperature. • Development of peat-specific temperature and pH proxies. Glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) are membrane-spanning lipids from Bacteria and Archaea that are ubiquitous in a range of natural archives and especially abundant in peat. Previous work demonstrated that the distribution of bacterial branched GDGTs (brGDGTs) in mineral soils is correlated to environmental factors such as mean annual air temperature (MAAT) and soil pH. However, the influence of these parameters on brGDGT distributions in peat is largely unknown. Here we investigate the distribution of brGDGTs in 470 samples from 96 peatlands around the world with a broad mean annual air temperature (−8 to 27 °C) and pH (3–8) range and present the first peat-specific brGDGT-based temperature and pH calibrations. Our results demonstrate that the degree of cyclisation of brGDGTs in peat is positively correlated with pH, pH = 2.49 × CBT peat + 8.07 ( n = 51, R 2 = 0.58, RMSE = 0.8) and the degree of methylation of brGDGTs is positively correlated with MAAT, MAAT peat (°C) = 52.18 × MBT 5me ′ − 23.05 ( n = 96, R 2 = 0.76, RMSE = 4.7 °C). These peat-specific calibrations are distinct from the available mineral soil calibrations. In light of the error in the temperature calibration (∼4.7 °C), we urge caution in any application to reconstruct late Holocene climate variability, where the climatic signals are relatively small, and the duration of excursions could be brief. Instead, these proxies are well-suited to reconstruct large amplitude, longer-term shifts in climate such as deglacial transitions. Indeed, when applied to a peat deposit spanning the late glacial period (∼15.2 kyr), we demonstrate that MAAT peat yields absolute temperatures and relative temperature changes that are consistent with those from other proxies. In addition, the application of MAAT peat to fossil peat (i.e. lignites) has the potential to reconstruct terrestrial climate during the Cenozoic. We conclude that there is clear potential to use brGDGTs in peats and lignites to reconstruct past terrestrial climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations307
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochimica et Cosmochimica ActaSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207