Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSRTACT: Canadian Standard of 1994, CAN/CSA-S16.1-94, and AISC-LRFD Specification of 1993 provide the factored compressive resistance of steel members other than solid rounds. However, the Canadian Standard for Antennas, Towers, and Antenna-Supporting Structures of 2001, CAN/CSA-S37-01, presented expressions for compressive strength of solid rounds, based on results of testing a limited number of solid rounds back to 1965. This paper summarizes the results of testing to-failure six round bars, three of stress-relieved steel and the other three of non-stress-relieved steel. The experimental ultimate load carrying capacity is compared to the superseded expressions found in the CAN/CSA-S-37-94 as well as the new expressions found in the CAN/CSA-S-37-01. This is in addition to the expression found in the AISC-LRFD specification of 1993. Reported testing in this paper is part of an experimental program on performance-based compressive strength of solid steel rounds of different material properties and geometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".