Diamond cleavage: importance to high pressure research
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extraordinary properties of diamond make it the number-one choice for anvils in high pressure experiments involving anvil cells. In much of the literature on the properties of diamond the only cleavage mentioned is {111}. However, experience has shown that diamond anvils made with their [001] axis oriented in line with the principal stress axis of the anvil or at a small angle to it often failed with flat faces having {110} orientations; a cleavage plane is reported in some publications. Analysis of the anisotropy of strength and Poisson ratio in diamond has shown that such orientations do, indeed, favor initial failure on {110} cleavage planes. This analysis, in conjunction with stereographic projections of the {111} and {110} cleavage planes, suggests that a 27° tilt of the [001] axis with respect to the linear stress axis by rotation around the [100] or [010] axis should provide significantly greater resistance to failure by cleaving.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it