MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2576240501

Scaling up from Micro Cognition to Macro Cognition: Using SGOMS to build Macro Cognitive Models of Sociotechnical Work in ACT-R

2011· article· en· W2576240501 on OpenAlexaff
Robert West, Sterling Somers

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociotechnical systemMacroCognitionComputer scienceWork (physics)Cognitive scienceCognitive modelOperations researchPsychologyEngineeringKnowledge management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SGOMS is a way of scaling up GOMS models to model multi agent work in complex sociotechnical systems.In particular, it allows GOMS to handle interruptions, multi-tasking, and re-planning.West and Pronovost (2009) discussed some of the theoretical issues around building an SGOMS model in ACT-R.This paper presents work in progress for two such models.Specifically, we used ACT-R to create a model of a worker in a sandwich shop and a model of a commercial airline pilot.Problems with scaling ACT-R up to the macro cognitive level are discussed and solutions are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyFrench-language works237,207