Monitoring and Measurement System for Green Operation of Geographically Distributed ICT Services
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite recent efforts and important results already achieved, the reduction of energy consumption and carbon emissions by Information and Communication Technologies is still far from the expected goals. As the annual growth in traffic is doubling every two years with more and more connections to the Internet, to be energy and carbon-aware it is paramount to implement a Monitoring and Measurement System which supports green strategies in a geographically distributed environment. Such an environment has some specific challenges that must be taken into account, such as the WAN connection, security and latency concerns. On the other hand, it also provides opportunities to reduce operational costs and emissions, improve reliability and resources management etc. This work proposes a framework which is capable of supporting green metrics in network monitoring. The framework comprises temporally differentiated data on emission factors and provides ground information able to support different applications. We have implemented the framework in a nationwide testbed and our experiments show the framework is able to provide the ground information for customizable green metrics, like power/energy, traffic, and carbon equivalent emissions. This framework can be used as a support for a variety of applications which depend on energy and emissions metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it