MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Is There a Role for ASCT in Patients with Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor of the Peritoneum?

2011· article· en· W2576728170 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel J. Cook, Zhiwei Wang, Mukta Arora, Hillard M. Lazarus, Kimberly A. Kasow, Martin Champagne, Wael Saber, Koen M. Van Besien, Gregory A. Hale, Edward A. Copelan, Mohamed B. Elmongy, Naoto T. Ueno, Biljana Horn, Shimon Slavin, Edward A. Stadtmauer

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThioTEPAEtoposideSurgeryCohortCyclophosphamideCarboplatinInternal medicinePlerixaforMelphalanBusulfanOncologyAutologous stem-cell transplantationChemotherapyCisplatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3092 Desmoplastic small round cell tumor of the peritoneum (DSRCTP) is a rare, frequently fatal solid tumor that occurs most commonly in adolescent males. Tumor characteristics were first described in 1989 and the largest review of 101 patients in 1996 demonstrated a median survival of 17 months (range 3–72) in patients with a median age of 21 years (range 6–38), none of whom underwent transplant. Survivorship has improved with the use of intensive alkylator regimens and incorporation of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). This study represents the largest reported cohort of patients with DSRCTP who have undergone ASCT. Increasingly aggressive chemotherapy regimens and ASCT have been used to try to prolong response and increase cure. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes in the largest reported cohort of patients with DSRCTP who have undergone ASCT. We identified 36 patients with DSRCTP reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 1999 and 2007 who received an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median age was 19 years (range 8–46) and 29 (81%) were male. Pre-transplant disease status was known in 31 patients, 13 of whom were in complete remission (CR). Twenty different conditioning regimens were identified for the 30 patients on which data was available with the most common agents being thiotepa (19 patients), etoposide (12 patients), mephalan (12 patients), cyclophosphamide (9 patients) and carboplatin (8 patients). The median follow up was 44 months. A subset of 18 patients had supplemental information obtained for confirmation of diagnosis (verification of the presence of translocation: t(11;22)(p13;q12)) and expanded clinical detail. We performed descriptive statistics to characterize the patients and outcomes. The probability of disease free survival (DFS) at one year for those patients in CR and not in CR was 75% (95% CI: 48–94%) and 35% (15–59%), respectively. For the entire cohort, 1 year DFS was 53% (39–69%). DFS at 3 years was 40% (15–69%) and 9% (0–29%) in the two groups, respectively. The probability of overall survival at three years was 57% (29–83%) for patients in CR and 28% (9–51%) for patients not in CR. Median survival for the entire cohort was 31 months (36 months for those in CR, 21 months for those not in CR). Treatment related mortality was low with only 1 death in the first 100 days. Engraftment at 42 days was 97% (88–100%). In summary, ASCT appears to be a tolerable approach in patients with DSCRTP with the greatest benefit seen in those patients who obtain CR. High intensity chemotherapy and ASCT leads to the longest DFS and OS in those patients who obtain a CR pre-transplant as might be expected. For those not in CR, the median OS in this series is greater (21 months) than previously reported (17 months) in patients not treated with ASCT suggesting a potential role for ASCT to prolong DFS and OS even in patients with residual or persistent disease pre-transplant. Overall, with low treatment related mortality and prolonged survival compared to historical controls, ASCT is a reasonable option for patients with DSRCTP though its role should be confirmed in larger studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→