MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2576764985 · doi:10.15353/vsnl.v1i1.49

Colour-based gesture recognition for American Sign Language via Hidden Markov Models

2015· article· en· W2576764985 on OpenAlex
Sara Greenberg, Jennifer Blight, A.K.K. Wong

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueVision Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidden Markov modelSign (mathematics)Gesture recognitionSpeech recognitionCentroidGestureFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Sign languageArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematicsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>We present a new approach to gesture recognition for use in a sign<br />language learning environment. This method utilizes inexpensive<br />cloth gloves to alleviate the difficulty of hand detection and to allow<br />for feature creation. Salient colours identify the glove base and<br />fingertip markers, which are then used to extract a hand centroid<br />and a convex hull describing the fingertips for each hand. A Hidden<br />Markov Model is created for each sign, as well as an additional<br />threshold model created from all signs. When a candidate sign is<br />performed, the sign of the HMM that produces the greatest likelihood<br />is matched, provided it also exceeds the threshold model<br />likelihood. Isolated recognition testing of the training library indicated<br />76% accuracy, and continuous recognition testing showed<br />60% accuracy.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it