MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Successful Tolerance of Deferasirox Following Desensitization for Significant Skin Rash

2011· article· en· W2576963054 on OpenAlexaff
Hatoon Ezzat, R. Robert Schellenberg, Heather A. Leitch, Linda M. Vickars

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeferasiroxMedicineRashTolerabilityAdverse effectDeferiproneDeferoxamineGastroenterologyInternal medicineSurgeryDermatologyThalassemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 5280 BACKGROUND: Deferasirox is an oral iron chelator that has become available in recent years. The long term tolerability profile of deferasirox is still being evaluated, however a common side effect is skin rash, which may occur in up to 10% of patients. This is usually mild to moderate and resolves with continued treatment. More severe rash may require interruption of therapy and reintroduction of deferasirox at a lower dose followed by gradual dose escalation. A short course of corticosteroids may be used. Occasional cases of angioedema have been reported for which cessation of deferasirox is recommended but re-introduction is difficult. We report three patients with hypersensitivity to deferasirox, two manifested as NCI CTC grade 3-skin rash and one as grade 1-skin rash. All were able to tolerate deferasirox following desensitization. METHODS: Two patients with β thalassaemia major and one with congenital sideroblastic anemia, all with transfusional iron overload, experienced skin rash to deferasirox and received a desensitization protocol, given orally as follows: Solution 1 (deferasirox 1.25 mg/ml): 1 ml given days 1–3 2 ml given days 4–6 5 ml given days 7–9 Followed by Solution 2 (deferasirox 12.5 mg/ml) 1 ml given days 10–12 2 ml given days 13–15 5 ml given days 16–18 The dose of deferasirox was subsequently increased by 125 mg/day every week until the desired dose was reached. RESULTS: Case 1: A 23 year-old female with b thalassaemia major, non-compliant with deferoxamine, was switched to deferasirox 1500 mg/day (20mg/kg/day). Nine days after starting deferasirox she experienced a low grade fever, extensive erythematous maculopapular rash and facial edema. Deferasirox was discontinued. Two days later the rash had progressed; prednisone was started at 50 mg/day and the rash resolved within 1 week. While still tapering prednisone (20 mg/day), deferasirox was re-started at 500 mg/day. The rash recurred within 2 days and deferasirox was discontinued. One year later the desensitization protocol was given and well tolerated without the development of skin rash; she is currently receiving deferasirox 1500 mg/day without difficulty. Case 2: A 21 year-old female with b thalassaemia major, non-compliant with deferoxamine, was switched to deferasirox 1500mg/day (20mg/kg/day). Ten days after starting deferasirox she developed diffuse erythema multiforme. Deferasirox was stopped and prednisone started at 1mg/kg/day with marked improvement. Five days later, still on prednisone in full doses, she was re-challenged with deferasirox 500 mg/day. The rash recurred and deferasirox was discontinued. One year later, the desensitization protocol was given and well tolerated without the development of skin rash. She is currently receiving deferasirox 1500mg/day without difficulty. Case 3: A 23 year-old female with congenital sideroblastic anemia receiving deferoxamine was switched to deferasirox 1500mg/day (20mg/kg/day) for ease of administration. Eight days after starting deferasirox she developed a maculopapular rash confined to the palms of the hands and soles of the feet, but associated with severe pruritis. Deferasirox was stopped and the patient declined prednisone. She resumed deferoxamine and was offered the deferasirox desensitization protocol. Desensitization was given successfully but required a three day extension of treatment with solution 1 (2ml) because of recurrent rash, which resolved over the following two days with the temporary addition of benadryl. She is currently receiving deferasirox 150mg/day on weekly dose escalation without difficulty. CONCLUSION: Deferasirox is often the chelation agent preferred by patients given its ease of administration. Given its documented reduction in total body iron, with promising effects on the removal of myocardial iron, the use of this agent is increasing. However, skin rash is a side effect that may limit the use of deferasirox in some patients. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a protocol that may successfully desensitize patients with hypersensitivity reactions to deferasirox, allowing them to tolerate this agent in therapeutic doses. Disclosures: Leitch: Novartis Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207