« Comme bouillabaisse, cela en est une bonne, M. le Président ». Les responsables politiques québécois, les relations internationales et la race (1960-1971)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’historiographie donne à la France un rôle souvent central, parfois disproportionné à l’essor des relations internationales du Québec au cours des années 1960. L’objectif de cette étude n’est pas de remettre en cause l’importance du rapport France-Québec, mais simplement de porter le regard ailleurs, particulièrement vers les pays du tiers-monde dans le contexte des premières tentatives d’institutionnalisation de la Francophonie. Nous cherchons avant tout à explorer le rapport des responsables politiques québécois à ces pays, afin de découvrir les tenants et aboutissants des conceptions de l’Autre africain. Si les échanges diplomatiques entre le Québec, le Canada et l’Afrique francophone ont été détaillés, la question raciale reste toujours invisible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".