MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2577053372

An Overview of the Progress towards Achieving Global Polio Eradication

2016· article· en· W2577053372 on OpenAlexaff
Soheil El-Azzouni

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Health: Annual Review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliomyelitis eradicationPoliomyelitisDisease EradicationMedicineGlobal healthPopulationOutbreakPolitical scienceEconomic growthEnvironmental healthPublic healthDiseaseVirologyPoliovirusNursingEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background:  Poliomyelitis is an infectious disease that causes irreversible paralysis in less than 1% of infected individuals. 1 Since 1988, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative was able to achieve significant progress towards the interruption of polio transmission. 2 However, the latest plan under Global Polio Eradication Initiative, known as the Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan, is still facing unprecedented challenges with the remaining cases in polio endemic countries. Such challenges are prominently faced in areas with regional instability and mass population displacements, resulting in polio outbreaks and re-importation due to low immunization coverage, and inadequate surveillance. 3,4 Methods: A comprehensive literature review was completed through different databases that included Global Health, Embase, Medline, Science Direct and Google Scholar for the following key terms: ‘polio*’, ‘vaccin*’, ‘Afghanistan’, ’Pakistan’, ‘import*’, ‘refusal’, ‘outbreak’,  ‘eradication’, ‘endgame ‘, ‘conflict’, ’risk’, ‘surveillance’, ‘spread’, and ‘challenge*’. A review search of published reports and archives from GPEI, CDC, WHO, UNICEF, End Polio Pakistan was also conducted and included as part of the assessment of recent progress with polio eradication. Discussion: There are remaining gaps towards achieving polio eradication, especially in endemic regions. A series of recommendations are proposed to overcome ongoing barriers involving the political, social, biological and financial aspects of polio campaigns. To overcome the setbacks that led to delaying previously set goals by GPEI, a more vigorous response, with an alteration from the current approach will be required to overcome ongoing challenges. The response involves an improved and expanded surveillance system through better monitoring, management, and timeliness. 5,6 In addition, better interventions are needed to address vaccine coverage, efficacy, safety, management, and supply, especially in regions with high risk of polio transmission and refusal rates in remaining endemic countries. 7,8 Conclusion: Through applying suggested recommendations, the current approach towards polio campaigns can be modified to achieve and sustain polio eradication .  The rooms of improvement can assist in refining immunization coverage, enhancing vaccine administration and effectiveness, avoiding delays in outbreak response, and providing reliable feedback on the progress of GPEI. These extensive efforts will not only improve the progress towards achieving polio eradication, but would also serve as a tool to limit the burden of other communicable diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.416 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Health: Annual ReviewSame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207