Estudo da vulnerabilidade dos solos na bacia hidrográfica do Ribeirão Claro - SP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because it is an unconfined aquifer and is relatively close to the surface, it becomes an easy target for infiltration of contaminants of various sources, such as pesticides and fertilizers, and also those related to human activities like leaking pipes, waste disposal and other substances from industrial activities and mining. The present work aims to study about the vulnerability of the soils on the north section of the Ribeirão Claro hydrografic basin, which covers almost the entire city of Rio Claro. A vulnerability map was created as the major product of this work, relating the geology and the use and occupation of the soil, in the area. Furthermore, fieldworks were conducted, in which in situ geotechnical testing was performed using the Guelph Permeameter, and deformed and undeformed soil samples were collected from all geological formations of the area, in order to perform laboratory geotechnical testing, to obtain the materials physical parameters, its grain size and sedimentation rate, and also its 6 permeability based on the varied load method. With the obtained results, it can be concluded that the hydraulic conductivity of the Rio Claro Formation's soils is heterogenous, a reflex of it's composition. The vulnerability for the aquifer area obtained in this work, is in general, high
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".