Radium-223 in a Community Setting for Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the toxicity, palliative benefit, and survival benefit of Radium-223 (Ra-223) in a community setting.Introduction: The ALSYMCA (Alpharadin in Symptomatic Prostate Cancer) trial demonstrated improved survival for men with painful bone metastasis from castration resistant prostate cancer who were treated with Ra-223. The median survival was 14.9 months for the Ra-223 patients compared to 11.3 months for patients treated with a placebo.Methods: We identified through the nuclear medicine records 11 patients who started Ra-223 between March 15, 2013 and December 10, 2015. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the published results of the ALSYMPCA patients with those from our institution.Results: The Hodges-Lehman estimate of the median survival of our patients from the date of the first Ra-223 infusion was 7.8 months. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was (2.8, 14.7; p=0.0122) indicating our patients had a significantly shorter survival than the Ra-223 ALSYMPCA patients.Our patients did not have a statistically significant worse rate of anemia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia. We used 3 measures of treatment effectiveness: 1) reduction in the pain scores, 2) reduction in the serum PSA, and 3) reduction in the alkaline phosphatase from baseline, but the reductions were not statistically significant.Conclusions: This small study is not meant to challenge the results of the ALSYMPCA international trial. It is intended only as a caution that prior lines of therapy, especially with newer agents such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, may attenuate the benefit from this treatment, particularly in elderly patients.Radium-223 in a Community Setting for Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".