MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2577578480 · doi:10.1145/3040230.3040241

Pricing for a Hybrid Delivery Model of Video Streaming

2017· article· en· W2577578480 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Charles Grégoire, Angèle M. Hamel, D. Marc Kilgour

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncentiveService providerRelayVideo on demandComputer scienceVideo streamingBusinessService (business)Peer-to-peerComputer networkMicroeconomicsMarketingEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Media streaming for video-on-demand requires a large initial outlay on server infrastructure. However, a peer-to-peer system whereby existing customers act as relays for new customers is a simple way to provide temporary capacity and gauge demand before committing to new resources. A customer who agrees to act as a relay should be provided the service at a discounted price, but at what price, and is this price affordable for the content provider? This paper investigates financial incentives for the hybrid model of video streaming services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation ReviewSame topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207