MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ASFIKSIA PERINATAL SEBAGAI FAKTOR RESIKO GANGGUAN PENDENGARAN PADA ANAK

2012· article· id· W2577579383 on OpenAlexaff
Sukri Rahman, Hanifatryevi Hanifatryevi

Bibliographic record

VenueMajalah Kedokteran Andalas · 2012
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsResponse Biomedical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsphyxiaAudiologySensorineural hearing lossGynecologyHearing lossAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstrakAsfiksia adalah keadaan di mana tubuh atau bagian tubuh kekurangan oksigen. Jika kondisi ini terjadi pada bayi baru lahir disebut dengan asfiksia perinatal, yang dapat menimbulkan kerusakan jaringan secara permanen maupun bersifat sementara, salah satunya adalah gangguan pendengaran sensorineural.Makalah ini akan membahas tentang mekanisme gangguan pendengaran akibat asfiksia, deteksi dini gangguan pendengaran dengan pemeriksaan Brain Evoked Response Auditory (BERA) dan Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE).Gangguan pendengaran akibat asfiksia dapat terjadi akibat beberapa mekanisme. Kelainan ini terlihat pada gambaran BERA dan OAE, dimana terjadinya peningkatan masalaten dan interval gelombang yang bersifat sementara atau menetap, serta ditemukan gangguan pada fungsi koklea bayi dengan asfiksia perinatal terutama pada frekuensi 1-5 kHz yang terdeteksi pada hari ke tiga sampai hari kelima kelahiran, dan terdapat perbaikan pada usia 1 bulan.Kata Kunci : Asfiksia perinatal, gangguan pendengaran, BERA, OAEAbstractAsphyxia is a condition in which the body or body part to lack of oxygen. If this condition occurs in newborns with perinatal asphyxia is also called, which can cause tissue damage is permanent or temporary. One of that is a sensorineural hearing loss.This paper will discuss the mechanisms of hearing loss due to asphyxia, early detection of hearing loss with an examination Brain Auditory Evoked Response (BERA) and Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE).Hearing loss due to asphyxia can occur due to several mechanisms. These abnormalities are seen on the results of BERA and OAE, where an increase in latent period and the interval waves that are temporary or permanent, and found interference with the function of the cochlea infants with perinatal asphyxia, especially at frequency of 1-5 kHz were detected on the third day until the fifth day of birth, and there are improvements to the age of 1 month.Key word : Perinatal asphyxia, hearing loss, Brain Auditory Evoked Response, Otoacoustic Emissions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMajalah Kedokteran AndalasSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207