MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2577919954 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2016-0337

Determination of coherent to Compton scattering differential cross section ratios of some inorganic materials with EDXRF

2017· article· en· W2577919954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicRadiation Shielding Materials Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCompton scatteringScatteringCross section (physics)Atomic physicsPhotonAbsorption cross sectionScattering cross-sectionGamma rayOpticsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we aimed to determine coherent to Compton scattering differential cross section ratios of some inorganic materials (BaSO 4 , CaF 2 , Mg 2 SiO 4 , MgSO 4 , and ZnSO 4 (7H 2 O)) for several scattering angles (95°, 105°, 115°, 125°, and 135°). Coherent to Compton scattering differential cross section ratios were investigated experimentally by using an HPGe detector, which has a resolution of 199.6 eV at the 5.9 keV. The samples were excited with 59.54 keV gamma rays emitted from Am 241 point source. The intensity ratios were corrected due to the photopeak efficiency of the gamma detector and absorption of photons in the target and air. It is observed that coherent to Compton scattering differential cross section ratios decrease with increasing scattering angle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it