MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2578086188 · doi:10.7202/1038553ar

De Polynésie à l’Europe des Lumières. Représentation raciale d’Aotourou et d’Omai en Europe 1769-1776

2016· article· fr· W2578086188 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marc-André Desmarais

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d histoire · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse les manières selon lesquelles fut faite la construction raciale de deux Polynésiens, Aotourou et Omai, ramenés respectivement en France et en Angleterre entre 1769-1776. Plutôt que de considérer les indigènes sur des critères morphologiques, leur représentation raciale est fondée sur la confrontation entre l’expérience de l’altérité et les attentes des contemporains envers Aotourou et Omai. À un point tel que la conjoncture socioculturelle de l’aristocratie européenne devint essentielle au processus de racialisation. Finalement, afin d’être racialisés en un « bon sauvage », les Polynésiens se devaient d’être vertueux et de respecter les pratiques sociales de l’élite aristocratique. Dans le cas contraire, ils seraient associés à une représentation bien inférieure nommée « ignoble sauvage ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d histoireSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207