MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DAYA SAING DAN FAKTOR PENENTU EKSPOR KOPI INDONESIA KE MALAYSIA DALAM SKEMA CEPT-AFTA

2016· article· id· W2578142682 on OpenAlexaff
Achmad Edi Setiawan, Teti Sugiarti

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriekonomika · 2016
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsAgribrands Purina (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessBusiness administrationAgricultural scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CEPT-AFTA dapat menjadi peluang untuk meningkatkan ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia, namun dalam perkembangannya ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia fluktuatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis daya saing dan faktor penentu ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia dalam skema CEPT-AFTA. Metode yang digunakan yaitu Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) untuk menganalisis daya saing ekspor kopi Indonesia di pasar Malaysia dan metode regresi linier berganda untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia. Hasil dari analisis RCA menunjukkan bahwa kopi Indonesia di Pasar Malaysia memiliki daya saing (nilai RCA>1) namun mengalami penurunan daya saing setelah diberlakukannya CEPT-AFTA. Hasil estimasi analisis regresi linier berganda menunjukkan bahwa faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ekspor kopi Indonesia ke pasar Malaysia adalah produksi kopi Indonesia, harga ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia, dan nilai tukar rupiah terhadap dollar Amerika. Sedangkan nilai RCA dan dummy CEPT-AFTA tidak berpengaruh

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgriekonomikaSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207