DAYA SAING DAN FAKTOR PENENTU EKSPOR KOPI INDONESIA KE MALAYSIA DALAM SKEMA CEPT-AFTA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>CEPT-AFTA dapat menjadi peluang untuk meningkatkan ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia, namun dalam perkembangannya ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia fluktuatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis daya saing dan faktor penentu ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia dalam skema CEPT-AFTA. Metode yang digunakan yaitu Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) untuk menganalisis daya saing ekspor kopi Indonesia di pasar Malaysia dan metode regresi linier berganda untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia. Hasil dari analisis RCA menunjukkan bahwa kopi Indonesia di Pasar Malaysia memiliki daya saing (nilai RCA&gt;1) namun mengalami penurunan daya saing setelah diberlakukannya CEPT-AFTA. Hasil estimasi analisis regresi linier berganda menunjukkan bahwa faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ekspor kopi Indonesia ke pasar Malaysia adalah produksi kopi Indonesia, harga ekspor kopi Indonesia ke Malaysia, dan nilai tukar rupiah terhadap dollar Amerika. Sedangkan nilai RCA dan dummy CEPT-AFTA tidak berpengaruh</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it