MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy and Safety of Allogeneic Double Negative T Cell As a Cellular Therapy for AML and Its Underlying Mechanism

2015· article· en· W2578427280 on OpenAlexaff
Jong Bok Lee, Weihsu Claire Chen, Elena Streck, Sohyeong Kang, Mark D. Minden, John E. Dick, Zhang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemotherapyMyeloid leukemiaLeukemiaCD8Minimal residual diseaseMedicineImmunologyHematopoietic stem cell transplantationChemotherapy regimenTransplantationHaematopoiesisStem cellCancer researchOncologyInternal medicineImmune systemBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of adult acute leukemia that is associated with a low long-term survival rate. While chemotherapy achieves remission in more than 70% of the treated AML patients, most relapse due to residual chemotherapy-resistant AML populations. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation reduces the relapse rate and demonstrates the efficacy of a cell-mediated treatment for the chemotherapy-resistant disease. However, its wide application is limited by donor availability and associated toxicity such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Hence, there is a need for a new treatment approach that targets chemotherapy-resistant AML blasts with minimal side effects. The goals of this study were to characterize allogeneic CD3+ CD4-CD8- double negative T cells (DNTs) as a potential new therapy for AML patients, and to dissect its underlying mechanisms. Using a flow cytometry-based in vitro killing assay, we demonstrated that the allogeneic DNTs expanded from healthy volunteers were cytotoxic against 23/29 primary AML patient blasts in a dose-dependent manner. Thirteen blast samples were obtained from chemotherapy refractory or relapsing AML patients and, of those, 9 were susceptible to DNTs. Further, the average level of specific killing mediated by DNTs against chemotherapy-susceptible and -resistant blasts were comparable (19.30% ± 3.34% and 15.91% ± 3.63%, respectively). The anti-leukemia activity of DNTs was further validated in AML-NSG xenograft models. A single infusion of DNTs into mice pre-engrafted with primary AML blasts from chemoresponsive, chemorefractory, and relapsed patients significantly reduced the leukemia burden. While a single injection of DNTs resulted in a significant reduction of leukemia burden from 30% to 12.8%, it was further reduced to 2.6% after three injections of DNTs. Furthermore, the survival of NSG mice administered with a lethal dose of AML cell line, MV4-11, in DNT-treated group was significantly superior to the untreated group (57% vs. 0% survival on day 34, respectively). Although residual blasts were observed from the DNT -treated group, their susceptibility to DNT cell-mediated cytotoxicity remained comparable to blasts obtained from the PBS-treated group and primary AML blasts initially used for engraftment, suggesting that AMLs do not develop resistance to DNT-mediated cytotoxicity. In contrast to its potent cytolytic activity against leukemic cells, DNTs did not target allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) in vitro. Administration of allogeneic DNTs into NSG mice engrafted with human HSPC had no effect on the engraftment level of human hematopoietic cells and their differentiation into different lineages. Further, in contrast to human PBMC, infusion of human DNTs did not cause xenogeneic GvHD in mice, collectively demonstrating the selective cytotoxic activity of allogeneic DNTs against leukemic cells. Using blocking assays, we showed that HLA-class I, NKG2D, and DNAM-1 were involved in DNT cell-mediated cytotoxicity against AML, whereas HLA-class II and T cell receptor did not play a significant role. We detected high levels of IFNγ release by DNTs upon encounter of susceptible AML targets. While IFNγ treatment alone did not induce AML cell death, neutralizing IFNγ reduced and pretreating AML cells with recombinant IFNγ increased their susceptibility to DNT cell killing. IFNγ treatment induced higher expressions of NKG2D and DNAM-1 ligands and blocking of NKG2D and DNAM-1 partially abrogated the effect of IFNγ on the AML-DNT interaction. Collectively, these studies demonstrated the safety and efficacy of allogeneic DNT therapy as a potential treatment for AML patients, including those with chemotherapy-resistant leukemia, and revealed the important molecules for the anti-leukemic activity of DNTs. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207