¿Las bombas de racimo ilegales en 2008? Hacia un nuevo proceso de desarme internacional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este texto analiza el significado del proceso de negociación internacional iniciado a finales de febrero de 2007 en Oslo con el objetivo de prohibir las bombas de racimo en un período máximo de dos años. Asimismo, se examinan cuestiones relativas al liderazgo efectivo por parte de algunas ONG y de Noruega en un nuevo proceso de “nueva diplomacia” que imita el modelo del Proceso de Ottawa, cuyo resultado más palpable fue el tratado internacional que prohíbe las minas antipersona. Finalmente, se analizan argumentos a favor y en contra de este nuevo proceso fuera de los foros tradicionales multilaterales de desarme, concluyendo con un moderado optimismo acerca de la posibilidades de que a finales de 2008 tengamos un tratado internacional que se ocupe de forma efectiva de los efectos humanitarios causados por las bombas de racimo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".