Determination of physical contaminants in wheat using hyperspectral imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cereal grains are an important part of human diet; hence, there is a need to maintain high quality and these grains must be free of physical and biological contaminants. A procedure was developed to differentiate physical contaminants from wheat using NIR (1000-1600 nm) hyperspectral imaging. Three experiments were conducted to select the best combinations of spectral pre-processing technique and statistical classifier to classify physical contaminants: seven foreign material types (barley, canola, maize, flaxseed, oats, rye, and soybean); six dockage types (broken wheat kernels, buckwheat, chaff, wheat spikelets, stones, and wild oats); and two animal excreta types (deer and rabbit droppings) from Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) wheat. These spectra were processed using five spectral pre-processing techniques (first derivative, second derivative, Savitzky-Golay (SG) smoothing and differentiation, multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), and standard normal variate (SNV)). The raw and pre-processed data were classified using Support Vector Machines (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), and k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) classifiers. In each experiment, two-way and multi-way classifications were conducted. Among all the contaminant types, stones, chaff, deer droppings and rabbit droppings were classified with 100% accuracy using the raw reflectance spectra and different statistical classifiers. The SNV technique with k-NN classifier gave the highest accuracy for the classification of foreign material types from wheat (98.3±0.2%) and dockage types from wheat (98.9±0.2%). The MSC and SNV techniques with SVM or k-NN classifier gave perfect classification (100.0±0.0%) for the classification of animal excreta types from wheat. Hence, the SNV technique with k-NN classifier was selected as the best model. Two separate model performance evaluation experiments were conducted to identify and quantify (by number) the amount of contaminant type present in wheat. The overall identification accuracy of the first degree of contamination (one contaminant type with wheat) and the highest degree of contamination (all the contaminant type with wheat) was 97.6±1.6% and 92.5±6.5%, for foreign material types; 98.0±1.8% and 94.3±6.2%r for dockage types; and 100.0±0.0% and 100.0±0.0%, respectively for animal excreta types. The canola, stones, deer, and rabbit droppings were perfectly quantified (100.0±0.0%) at all the levels of contaminations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".