MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MEMPERTIMBANGKAN KONTRIBUSI CHARLES TAYLOR TERHADAP STUDI AGAMA DI INDONESIA

2016· article· id· W2578748359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEpistemé Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman · 2016
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and Radicalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of CambridgeHarvard University
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesSocial scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artikel ini membahas tentang Charles Taylor, salah satu filsuf dari McGill University, Kanada. Ia telah menghasilkan berbagai karya dalam bidang filsafat, sejarah ide, imajinasi sosial, modernitas, identitas, religi, ilmu kemanusiaan, ilmu sosial, bahasa dan mendapatkan perhatian dari berbagai sarjana di seluruh dunia, kecuali Indonesia. Artikel ini merupakan upaya perdana untuk memperkenalkan karya-karya Taylor, yang hampir semua berbahasa Inggris dan Prancis. Studi bibliografi ini, paling tidak akan memberikan genealogi gagasan-gagasan Taylor. Dalam studi ini dijelaskan siapa saja sarjana yang telah melakukan studi terhadap pemikiran Taylor. Adapun susunan artikel ini adalah biografi intelektual Taylor, karya-karyanya, para penstudi Taylor, dan cuplikan pemikirannya. Akhirnya, ditemukan bahwa karya-karya Taylor merupakan usahanya untuk memberikan peran kembali agama di dalam ruang publik, dimana argumen-argumennya telah banyak mengundang perdebatan di kalangan para sarjana. Paling tidak, artikel ini mampu memberikan masukan bagi para sarjana yang mengkaji Islam di Indonesia, untuk dapat mengunakan model-model argumen yang dilakukan oleh Taylor, dalam memahami religi dalam era kontemporer.This article is about Charles Taylor, a philosopher from McGill University, Canada. He has authored many works in philosophy, history of ideas, social imaginary, modernity, identity, human sciences, social sciences, language, and received many responses from scholars internationally, except Indonesia. This study is an introduction to his works, which are mostly written in English and France. As bibliographical study, this article will map out varieties of Taylor’s ideas in his works. This study listed some of scholars who study Charles Taylor’s thought. Furthermore, this article will examine intellectual biography of Taylor, his works, and works on him by Western scholars. Finally, it argued that his works have taken a step how to integrate the role of religion in public spaces, which is still debated among scholars. Last but not least, this essay will enhance of Muslim scholars in Indonesia to adapt Taylor’s argument in religious in contemporary era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it