MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2578957369 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.2328.8086

Collective institutional entrepreneurship for fostering sustainable energy transitions in India

2016· article· en· W2578957369 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Suyash Jolly

Bibliographic record

VenueTU/e Research Portal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDanish International Development AgencyNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaLappeenranta University of TechnologyCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipBusinessWork (physics)Sustainable energySustainabilityEconomic systemPolitical scienceEconomic geographyEconomicsRenewable energyPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapidly developing countries like India face numerous challenges related to social and environmental sustainability which are associated with their fast economic growth and rising energy demand, climate change, and widening disparities between rich and poor.Recently a number of claims have been made in the literature that the prospects of alternative development pathways in emerging economies in Asia are becoming more likely, and that these economies might even leapfrog Western initiatives.This paper contributes by reporting on the five most visible and established initiatives in the area of off-grid solar PV energy in India, specifically honing in on the innovative business models that are evolving.We develop a new typology of upscaling dimensions in order to analyse these five initiatives.They are found to be quite successful, but have difficulty in terms of reaching the poorest of the poor (deep upscaling) and bringing about required institutional change (institutional upscaling).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTU/e Research Portal→Same topicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development→French-language works237,207→