MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2579035871 · doi:10.1016/j.proeps.2017.01.004

Chlorine Stable Isotope and Helium Isotope Studies Contributing to the Understanding of the Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Old Groundwater

2017· article· en· W2579035871 on OpenAlexaff
Teodóra Szőcs, Shaun K. Frape, Rhys Gwynne, László Palcsu

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Earth and Planetary Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterGeologyIsotopes of heliumHeliumMantle (geology)Stable isotope ratioIsotopeGeochemistryStructural basinIsotopes of oxygenDeuteriumEnvironmental isotopesGroundwater flowMeteoric waterIsotopes of chlorineGeomorphologyChemistryAquiferAtomic physicsGroundwater rechargeNuclear physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chlorine stable isotope and helium isotope data were integrated in order to study the chemical and isotopic characteristics of old groundwater in the Pannonian Basin. Former studies showed groundwater is of meteoric origin, based on oxygen and deuterium isotopes, which have isotopic signatures of formation waters from the deeper part of the basin. Depletion of the heavier 37Cl isotope can be observed along the flow paths. Despite the fact that most of the sampled groundwater contains high helium levels, indicating a crustal helium origin, their 3He content is also high. The 3He/4He ratios (expressed in R/Rac) with values between 0.4 and 1.2 shows that helium of mantle origin must also be a component in the groundwater along the flow paths. The presence of mantle origin helium could be detected not just in the deeper part of the basin, but even in the Quaternary sediments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Earth and Planetary ScienceSame topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207