MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Renal effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor knockout in Akita‐diabetic mice

2016· article· en· W2579358365 on OpenAlexaff
Panai Song, Yiling Fu, Hongyu Qiu, Akira Ōnishi, Daniel J. Drucker, Volker Vallon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineAlbuminuriaDiabetes mellitusGlucagonChemistryGlucagon-like peptide-1CreatinineKidneyType 2 diabetesMedicineInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) is a gut‐derived hormone that enhances glucose‐dependent insulin release and has anti‐oxidative and protective effects mediated through GLP‐1 receptor (GLP1R) in various tissues. Here, we determined whether the GLP1R has a pathophysiologic role in the diabetic kidney. Methods GLP1R‐KO mice (C57BL/6J) were backcrossed to DBA2 background for at least 4 generations and crossed with heterozygous Ins2 Akita mice, a genetic model of type 1 diabetes, to generate 4 experimental groups; i) WT (n=7), ii) GLP1R‐KO (n=14), iii) diabetic WT (n=6), and iv) diabetic GLP1R‐KO (n=10). Body weight, blood glucose, urine glucose and albumin to creatinine ratios, GFR (by plasma elimination kinetics of FITC‐sinistrin in conscious mice), and kidney weight were determined at 16 weeks of age. Results In non‐diabetic mice, no significant differences were observed between GLP1R‐KO and WT for bodyweight (26.1±1.0 vs 26±1.3 g), blood glucose (127±4 vs 112±5 mg/dl), urine glucose (2.5±0.3 vs 3.6±0.8 umol/mg), albuminuria (39±7 vs 37±19 μg/mg), and GFR (18±1 vs 22±2 μl/min/g), while kidney weight tended to be reduced in GLP1R‐KO (7.8±0.2 vs 8.5±0.3 mg/g; P=0.064). In GLP1R‐KO and WT mice, diabetes increased to similar levels: blood glucose (515±21 vs 501±32 mg/dl), urine glucose (3504±426 vs 5515±864 umol/mg), albuminuria (117±41 vs 102±22 ug/mg), food and fluid intake (not shown), and GFR (28±2 vs 33±3 ul/min/g), associated with a similar reduction in body weight (23.1±0.9 vs 23.7±0.6 g). While diabetes increased kidney weight in GLP1R‐KO and WT to similar absolute levels (11.8±0.8 vs 10.3±0.4 mg/g), the diabetes‐induced fractional increase was enhanced in GLP1R‐KO vs WT (increase of 51 vs 21%). Conclusion 1) On a predominant DBA2 genetic background, type 1 Akita diabetes increased blood glucose levels, GFR, kidney to body weight ratios, and albuminuria. 2) The effects of diabetes on blood glucose, GFR and albuminuria occurred independent of the GLP1R, whereas the absence of the GLP1R appeared to facilitate the diabetes‐induced increase in kidney to body weight ratios. Support or Funding Information National Institutes of Health (R01DK56248, P30DK079337) and AstraZeneca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→