MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Phase II Study of Temozolomide Therapy for Poor Risk Patients Age ≥ 60 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) - Low Levels of MGMT May Predict for Response.

2005· article· en· W2579376283 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Brandwein, Aaron D. Schimmer, Andre C. Schuh, Vikas Gupta, Richard A. Wells, Lin Yang, Mark D. Minden

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineMyeloid leukemiaLeukemiaCytarabineNauseaDecitabineTemozolomideInduction chemotherapySurgeryPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyOncologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A previous Phase I study (Seiter K et al, 2002) had shown antileukemic activity of temozolomide (TMZ) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted a Phase II study of TMZ in poor risk patients aged 60 years and over with AML. Patients were eligible if they had received no prior inductions and had one of the following: poor risk cytogenetics (complex abnormalities, deletions of chromsome 7 or 5, 11q23 abnormalities, inv[3]) or secondary leukemia (prior hematologic disorder or therapy-related leukemia). Patients who had not achieved remission or had relapsed after one prior induction course, regardless of other risk factors, were also eligible. Of 43 evaluable patients, 17 had received one prior induction and 26 had received no prior therapy - of the latter group, 12 had secondary leukemia and the remaining 14 had poor risk cytogenetics. The dose of TMZ was 200 mg/m2 orally daily for 7 days. Patients achieving partial response (PR) were eligible to receive a second identical course. Patients achieving complete response (CR or CRp) were eligible to receive TMZ 200 mg/m2 orally daily for 5/28 days for up to 6 postremission cycles. The treatment was well-tolerated, with mild to moderate myelosuppression and minimal nausea. Most patients received therapy on an outpatient basis. Four patients achieved complete response (3 CR and 1 CRp), 2 achieved PR and 2 had marrow aplasia at Day 30–35; the remaining 35 patients did not respond. Of the 4 patients achieving CR, one relapsed after 3 months, while the remaining patients remain in CR after 7, 12 and 29 months respectively. The 2 PR patients did not respond further to a second induction course. Because sensitivity to TMZ has been previously linked to expression of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), we assessed baseline levels of MGMT in leukemia blasts pre-treatment by Western blot. Of 24 evaluable samples, 10 had no detectable MGMT; this group included all 4 CR patients, one PR and one aplasia. Of the 14 with detectable MGMT there were no antileukemic responses. The remaining samples were either not available or not evaluable for MGMT. In conclusion, TMZ therapy was well tolerated and had antileukemic activity with approximately a 10% CR rate in older poor risk AML patients. MGMT appears to be predictive of response - all of the responders had undetectable MGMT activity, while no antileukemic activity was seen in MGMT positive cases. This assay may therefore be useful in selecting potential candidates for this treatment. Confirmation of this finding in a larger series is warranted. Furthermore, pharmacologic reduction in MGMT levels could potentially increase response rates to TMZ and warrants study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→