the Efficacy and Safety of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate In Patients Requiring Urgent Reversal of Warfarin, A Retrospective Canadian Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 3344 Background: Major bleeding remains the most frequent adverse effect of oral anticoagulant therapy. A rapid method of reversal is required for patients on warfarin who suffer acute bleeding or require emergency surgery. Octaplex is a prothrombin complex concentrate recently recommended for use by the National Advisory Committee for Blood and Blood Products of Canada (Canadian Blood Services) at a dose of 1000 IU of factor IX activity. It ensures rapid INR correction by providing vitamin K-dependent factors without a large volume load. The main goal of this study was to investigate both the efficacy and safety of Octaplex use in a tertiary care center in Quebec, Canada. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on the charts of patients who received Octaplex for urgent warfarin reversal between 1 January 2009 and 31 October 2009. Data collected included INRs pre and post Octaplex administration, and documentation of any adverse events. Results: We identified 146 occasions when Octaplex was administered for urgent INR reversal. A total of 118 patients were included in the study with a median age of 77. The three most frequent indications for Octaplex were: 1) gastrointestinal bleeding, 2) intracranial hemorrhage, and 3) pre-procedural INR reversal. The majority of patients (90.7%) were treated with Octaplex at a dose of 1000 IU of factor IX activity, with a range of 500 IU to 5000 IU. The average mean pre-and post INRs were 4.00 and 1.65, respectively. Overall, 89.8% (130/146) of patients corrected to an INR < 2.0, of which 51.5% (67/130) corrected to an INR < 1.5. Although 8.2% (12/146) of patients were considered to have a poor response (post INR > 2.1), these patients tended to have a higher mean pre-INR value (5.28 vs. 2.69) and still achieved important absolute drops in INR (range 1.1–9.3, mean 2.91). Only 4 patients (2.7%) did not experience a reversal of their INR. Seventeen patients received second doses of Octaplex, 70.6% (12/17) of whom achieved a post INR < 1.5 and 94.1% (16/17) achieved a post INR < 2.0. There were 8 reported thrombotic events amongst 118 patients: 3 myocardial infarctions, 3 DVTs, 1 ischemic limb and 1 intracardiac clot. All patients with these adverse events had other co-morbities that could have also contributed to these toxicities. Conclusion: Octaplex is efficient and appears to be safe in the urgent reversal of INR in patients taking vitamin K antagonists. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".