MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2579900267 · doi:10.5539/ells.v7n1p31

Beckett’s Cruel Lover

2017· article· en· W2579900267 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mustafa Ahmad Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language and Literature Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSamuel Beckett and Modernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrueltySelfishnessTheme (computing)GirlPsychoanalysisArtLiteraturePhilosophyPsychologyCriminologySocial psychologyComputer scienceDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Samuel Beckett wrote Eh Joe for television production in 1965. He wrote this bleak play, for his friend the actor Jack MacGowran. The first production of the play was in Germany at Suddenscher Rundfunk Stuttgart on 13 April 1966, and was directed by Samuel Beckett. In both his novels and plays, Beckett paid special attention to human relationships. In his major plays cruelty is the pivot theme. In Eh Joe, Joe a solitary figure is trying to secure himself in his room in an attempt to run away from Voice who keeps reminding him of his cruelty to the girl who loves him. But the past comes to him in a form of Woman’s Voice to remind him of his selfishness and cruelty. Voice focuses on Joe’s cruelty in his relationships and continues hammering him till the end of the play. In less than fifteen minutes Beckett successfully portrays Joe’s selfishness, indifference and cruelty to women who love him.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language and Literature StudiesSame topicSamuel Beckett and ModernismFrench-language works237,207