MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2579902802 · doi:10.7202/1038621ar

La notion d’économie du contrat en droit français et québécois

2017· article· fr· W2579902802 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Éric Fokou

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue générale de droit · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceJurisprudencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour la doctrine française, l’économie du contrat constitue l’une des notions prétoriennes les plus influentes en droit contemporain des contrats. Notion à géométrie variable, née en jurisprudence française en 1894, l’économie du contrat fut reprise dès 1919 par les juridictions québécoises. Son essor reste cependant plus significatif en droit français où elle a reçu, depuis lors, une stature constitutionnelle. Cette étude propose, dans une approche systématico-fonctionnaliste, d’examiner les contours et les solutions que la notion inspire à travers le prisme du droit comparé, et présente dès lors un grand intérêt pour la doctrine québécoise où elle demeure encore peu connue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue générale de droitSame topicLaw, Economics, and Judicial SystemsFrench-language works237,207