MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2579926597 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.876

Paediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada (PICNIC) Study of the Epidemiology of Bacterial and Fungal Meningitis in Infants Aged <90 Days

2016· article· en· W2579926597 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lynda Ouchenir, Christian Renaud, Ari Bitnun, Sarah Khan, Michelle Barton, Jason Brophy, Jennifer Bowes, Jane McDonald, André-Anne Boisvert, Ashley Roberts, Joseph Ting, Joan Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPicnicMedicineEpidemiologyMeningitisBacterial meningitisPathogenic organismPediatricsIntensive care medicineMicrobiologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Bacterial and fungal meningitis remain a cause of mortality and morbidity in young infants. There is a paucity of information on bacterial meningitis in North America in the era of infant pneumococcal vaccine and intra-partum group B streptococcus (GBS) prophylaxis. Methods. A retrospective chart review for all newborns from 0 to 90 days of age was performed in 8 centers across Canada for the years 2013 and 2014 to describe the etiology and outcome of bacterial and fungal meningitis. Cases were identified through search of ICD-10 codes. Results. A total of 113 cases of bacterial meningitis and one case of Candidal meningitis were identified. Sixty-four were proven cases with bacteria or fungi identified in CSF and 50 were suspected cases, with CSF pleocytosis and bacteria identified at another sterile site. Pathogens were Escherichia coli (E. coli) (37/114 [32.5%]) GBS (35/114 [30.7%]) and other Gram negative and positive bacteria (29/114 [25.4%]). The remaining cases were divided between N. meningitidis (N = 4), Hemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) (N = 3), Listeria (N = 3) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (N = 1). Seventeen cases (14.9%) of early-onset (day 0–6) meningitis, 63 (55.2%) of late-onset (day 7–29) and 34 (29.8%) of very late-onset (day 30–89) were identified. Amongst the early-onset cases GBS was the leading cause (8/17 [47.4%]) cases and E. coli represented 4 cases (23.5%). The candidal meningitis and one case of Hib were amongst the early-onset. In the late onset cases, the leading cause was E. coli (24/63 [38.1%]) followed by other bacteria (19/63[30.2%]) and GBS (16/63 [25.4%]). The remaining late-onset were Listeria (N = 3) and Neisseria meningitidis (N = 1). GBS predominated in the very late-onset category (11/34 [32.4%]) followed by E. coli (9/34 [25.7%]) and other bacteria (8/34 [23.5%]). In the remaining very late-onset cases were N. meningitis (N = 3), Hib (N = 2) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (N = 1). The case fatality rate was 6% (7/114) cases. Thirty-nine patients (34.2%) had seizures after onset of CNS symptoms, 22 (19.3%) patients developed hydrocephalus of which 14 (12.3%) required CSF shunts. Conclusion. GBS and E. coli remain the two leading causes of bacterial meningitis amongst neonates in Canada. The case fatality rate and morbidity remain significant and warrant the need for development of new strategies to prevent both early and late onset GBS meningitis. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207