JOINT IMPACTS OF THERAPY DURATION, DRUG EFFICACY AND TIME LAG IN IMMUNE EXPANSION ON IMMUNITY BOOSTING BY ANTIVIRAL THERAPY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antiviral drug therapy that targets on boosting virus-specific immune response has become very promising in controlling the virus, especially when completely eradicating the virus from the host turns out to be difficult. Using a concrete viral infection model that incorporates the time lag needed for the expansion of immune cells, we numerically explored the joint impacts of the duration of therapy, the efficacy of the drugs and the time lag in immune expansion on immunity boosting for a single phase of therapy. Our findings reveal that a single phase of therapy can establish sustained immunity if the therapy is stopped in a suitable range of timing and large time lag in the expansion of immune cells and too strong or too weak therapy would lead to a failure in immunity boosting. Our findings may provide some insights on designing efficient and rational therapy strategies in boosting sustained immunity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it