Character Education Integration in Secondary School English Curriculum
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Character education is not a new phenomenon. Although much of the discussion surrounding \ncharacter education focuses on elementary level students and schools, character education \nhas had a surge in popularity in recent years. This study seeks to investigate the ways in \nwhich secondary school English teachers integrate character education into the English \ncurriculum. Data were gathered through two semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with two \nsecondary school English teachers who express a level of expertise in the integration of \ncharacter education into the English curriculum. Findings point to the lack of a single \ndefinition of character education; teaching character through modelling; teaching character \nthrough literature and current events; encouraging student reflection; and the importance of \nsupportive communities. The results of this research serve to provide transferrable \ntechniques for secondary school teachers who aspire to fuse character education into their \neveryday practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it