MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2580250172 · doi:10.1109/epeps.2016.7835426

Loewner Matrix interpolation for noisy S-parameter data

2016· article· en· W2580250172 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Kabir, Yi Qing Xiao, Roni Khazaka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrix pencilInterpolation (computer graphics)Computer scienceAlgorithmPerturbation (astronomy)Stability (learning theory)Matrix (chemical analysis)Noise (video)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loewner Matrix (LM) interpolation technique was proposed as an efficient macromodeling approach compared to state of the art technologies. However, the method becomes inaccurate in presence of noise as it interpolates noise itself. In this paper, we propose a LM interpolation technique suitable for extracting an accurate and passive macromodel from noisy S-parameter data. An order searching algorithm to find the most accurate model maintaining stability is proposed first. Then we propose a least-square approximation based correction on the macromodel. Finally, the passivity of the model is ensured by using a Hamiltonian Matrix Pencil perturbation scheme. The advantages of the proposed approach is illustrated using one full-wave example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207