MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2580461169

Full-Scale Cyclic Testing of Deep Slender Wide-Flange Steel Beam-Columns under Unidirectional and Bidirectional Lateral Drift Demands

2017· article· en· W2580461169 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFlangeStructural engineeringBeam (structure)Moment of inertiaMoment (physics)BucklingMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep and slender wide-flange steel beam-columns are commonly used in steel special moment frames (SMFs) in North America. These sections provide large moment-of-inertia required to satisfy the design code’s drift limits while keeping the column steel weight at minimum. Due to their low out-of-plane moment-of-inertia and high web and flange slenderness ratios, such sections are vulnerable to local and global geometric instabilities when subjected to lateral drift demands coupled with compressive axial load. Past experimental research on steel beam-columns has mainly focused on small and stocky wide-flange sections. To this end, an extensive testing program was conducted at École Polytechnique de Montreal that investigated the cyclic behavior of 10 full-scale deep beam-columns. The column specimens were 600mm deep (i.e., W610 sections). The beam-columns were tested under unidirectional and bidirectional lateral loading protocols coupled with different levels of constant compressive axial load. The test setup involved a 6 degrees-of-freedom control system that was capable of realistically simulating the flexibility of the beam-to-column connection at the top of a first-story beam-column; hence the tests utilized a movable point of inflection during lateral loading as would occur in reality.<br/><br/>This paper discusses the main findings from the experimental program and a corroborating finite element analytical study that investigated the hysteretic behavior of 40 different deep wide-flange beam-columns. In particular, the effects of the local and global slenderness ratio, lateral loading protocol, applied axial load ratios, and boundary conditions on the column’s hysteretic behavior were quantified. Furthermore, the effect of bidirectional lateral deformations coupled with compressive axial load on the overall dynamic stability of steel beam-columns is discussed. Finally, out-of-plane forces exerted at the top of the column due to twisting and global buckling about the column’s weak-axis are quantified. The quantification of out-of-plane forces is essential to properly design the lateral bracing of steel beam-columns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it