MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2580648861 · doi:10.1161/atvb.33.suppl_1.a441

Abstract 441: Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) is Elevated in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Resides Predominantly in LDL

2013· article· en· W2580648861 on OpenAlexaff
Bashar Jabor, Hong Y. Choi, Isabelle L. Ruel, Anouar Hafiane, Jacques Genest

Bibliographic record

VenueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2Internal medicineMedicineCoronary artery diseaseAcute coronary syndromeLipoproteinInflammationEndocrinologyGastroenterologyPhospholipase A2Myocardial infarctionCholesterolCardiologyChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipoprotein associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) may play a role in the formation of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques and plaque rupture. Its plasma distribution and mass in subjects with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are not characterized. The objective of this study was to examine plasma levels and distribution of Lp-PLA2 in patient with ACS. We compared plasma levels of LP-PLA2 in 23 patients within 48 hours of presentation of an ACS (visit 1) and 12 weeks after (visit 2), in 24 patients with chronic, stable coronary artery disease (sCAD) and in normal healthy controls. The distribution of Lp-PLA2 was determined by ultracentrifugation (UTC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation of plasma lipoproteins and immunoblotting analysis. Lp-PLA2 mass was determined by ELISA The ACS patients (18 males/5 females, mean age 57±9.2) had hsCRP levels of 32.6±60.4 mg/L (ACS visit1) vs. 1.9±1.3 mg/L (ACS visit2), reflecting systemic inflammation. Stable CAD hsCRP 1.3±1.3 mg/L and controls 0.6±0.2 mg/L did not differ significantly. HDL cholesterol levels were 1.02±0.24 mmol/L for ACS visit 1, 1.00±0.3 mmol/L for ACS visit2, and 1.11±0.29 mmol/L for stable CAD. Plasma Lp-PLA2 levels were significantly higher in ACS visit1 subjects than in the ACS visit2 (144.3±60.6 vs. 89.5±40.0 ng/mL, p<0.0001). Interestingly, sCAD patients had slightly higher Lp-PLA2 levels that ACS visit 2 (p=0.003). The distribution of Lp-PLA2 differed according to the technique used. We found that only approximately 45% of Lp-PLA2 mass remained in the lipoprotein fraction (d<1.21 g/L) after UTC, with the majority (43%) in the LDL fraction and only <3% in the HDL fraction. The remainder (55% was found in the d>1.21 g/L, suggesting that Lp-PLA2 is only loosely bound to lipoproteins, and the majority resides in LDL. Here, we show that subjects with an ACS have markedly increased Lp-PLA2 levels acutely and that these levels fall within 12 weeks. Surprisingly, Lp-PLA2 is only loosely bound to lipoproteins and may be displaced in inflammatory conditions. The increase in Lp-PLA2 in ACS may contribute to the generation of oxidized fatty acyls and lysophopsphlipids and potentially compound the local inflammatory reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular BiologySame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207