MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2580652393 · doi:10.4000/rfsic.2724

Le film choral, entre interactivité et hypertextualité

2017· article· fr· W2580652393 on OpenAlexaff
Maxime Labrecque

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtChoirHumanitiesVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le film choral, empruntant l’une des branches du film à protagonistes multiples, fait cohabiter plusieurs histoires qui s’entrecroisent. Cet article situe cette forme narrative et effectue des rapprochements avec des genres limitrophes, tout en précisant quelles sont les différences. Le succès du film choral serait possiblement dû au compromis intéressant qu’il propose au spectateur, qui ne s’égare plus dans les dédales d’une fiction hypertextuelle ou d’une expérience interactive. Après une exploration de la théorie de l’hypertexte de fiction, la discussion se poursuit sur les possibilités interactives au sein d’un film choral.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.040
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française des sciences de l’information et de la communicationSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207