MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2580676852

Polynomial chaos solution to the Black Scholes equation with a random volatility

2012· article· en· W2580676852 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsApplied mathematicsVolatility (finance)Black–Scholes modelOrthonormal basisPolynomial chaosSABR volatility modelPolynomialImplied volatilityMathematical analysisEconometricsMonte Carlo methodPhysicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the Black Scholes equation with uncertainty in its volatility is considered. A numerical algorithm for option pricing based on the orthonormal polynomials from the Askey scheme is derived. Then dependence of polynomial chaos on the distribution type of the volatility is investigated. Numerical experiments show that when appropriate polynomial chaos is chosen as a basis in the random space for the volatility, the solution to the Black Scholes equation converges significantly fast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it