MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2580712357 · doi:10.5006/c2013-02118

Corrosion of a Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger

2013· article· en· W2580712357 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey Xie, Katy Yazdanfar, Murray Butcher, Tyler Rockwell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Canadian institutionsNova Chemicals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShell and tube heat exchangerCorrosionHeat exchangerMaterials scienceTube (container)Shell (structure)MetallurgyComposite materialMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Inspection revealed that the carbon steel tubes of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger suffered wall-loss to a degree of threatening the operation reliability of the heat exchanger. The shell side is cooling water and the tube side is the process stream in this heat exchanger. A metallurgical characterization was conducted on the carbon steel tubes to investigate the failure mechanism and provide recommendations for potential mitigation. Tubes and scales were characterized in terms of microstructures, morphologies and compositions. The tubes were found to suffer corrosion in the form of pitting corrosion on both the shell and tube side surfaces. Pits were densely present on the entire tube side surface, but were much shallower than the pits on the shell side surface. Pitting corrosion on the shell side surface was very deep and would be presumably responsible for potential leakage of the heat exchanger. Detailed characterization illustrated that pitting corrosion on the shell side surface was the result of tuberculation under deposits, while the pitting corrosion on the tube side surface was caused by hydrochloric acid aqueous solution generated by the reaction between condensed water and organic chloride in the process gas stream. Severity of pitting corrosion on the shell side surface was revealed to be position dependent, i.e. corrosion at 3:00 and 9:00 o’clock positions was most severe, while the 6:00 o’clock position was free of corrosion, and the corrosion at 12:00 o’clock position was of moderate severity. These observations were the result of precipitation in cooling water on the shell side surface, especially between the tube interfaces, resulting in excessive accumulation of deposits at 3:00 and 9:00 o’clock positions. To mitigate corrosion it was thus recommended to maintain a fast flow of the cooling water; control the species which can potentially precipitate; if practical, separate the tubes to a relatively wider spacing; or substitute the carbon steel tubes with duplex stainless steel tubes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Diagnostics and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207