MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Novel Real-Time Tone-Mapping Operator for Noisy Logarithmic CMOS Image Sensors

2016· article· en· W2580777197 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jing Li, Orit Skorka, Kamal Ranaweera, Dileepan Joseph

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Imaging · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsTone mappingFixed-pattern noiseComputer scienceComputer visionNoise (video)Artificial intelligenceLogarithmImage sensorHistogramCMOSDistortion (music)Dynamic rangeOperator (biology)High dynamic rangeImage (mathematics)Electronic engineeringMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Logarithmic CMOS image sensors are easily able, at video rates, to capture scenes where the dynamic range (DR) is high. However, tone mapping is required to output resulting images or videos to standard low-DR displays. This article proposes a new method, designed especially for logarithmic CMOS image sensors, which can suffer from temporal, and residual fixed pattern, noise. The novel tone mapping, a global operator based on histogram adjustment, uses a model of the camera noise to ensure that the mapping does not amplify the noise above a display threshold. Moreover, to reduce the likelihood of flickering, a temporal adaptation process is incorporated into the histogram calculation. Furthermore, to reduce complexity for real-time processing, a fixed-point implementation is designed for the proposed tone mapping. The novel operator and its fixed-point design are validated through offline and real-time experiments with a logarithmic CMOS image sensor. © 2016 Society for Imaging Science and Technology. [DOI: 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2016.60.2.020404]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic ImagingSame topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207