MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Fibrinogen and von Willebrand Factor-Independent Platelet Aggregation: The Essential Roles of β3 Integrin, Thrombin, and Divalent Ca2+ Cations.

2005· article· en· W2580842912 on OpenAlexaff
Reheman Adili, Pingguo Chen, Richard O. Hynes, John Freedman, Denisa D. Wagner, Heyu Ni

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombinChemistryPlateletRistocetinAdenosine diphosphatePlatelet activationVon Willebrand factorDivalentFibrinogenIntegrinBiochemistryPlatelet membrane glycoproteinPlatelet-rich plasmaHirudinCoagulationBiophysicsReceptorInternal medicinePlatelet aggregationMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It has been documented that fibrinogen (Fg) is required for platelet aggregation. However, we recently found that platelet rich thrombi still formed in mice lacking either Fg (Fg−/−) or both Fg and vWF (Fg/vWF−/−) (Ni et al, JCI106:385–392, 2000). To explore the potential mechanisms of Fg/vWF-independent platelet aggregation, we studied platelet aggregation in vitro in platelet rich plasma (PRP). We found no platelet aggregation in Fg−/− or Fg/vWF−/− PRP induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the presence of anticoagulant reagents including divalent cation chelators (ACD, sodium citrate, and EDTA), and thrombin inhibitors (heparin, hirudin, PPACK). Since no fibrin formation occurs in Fg/vWF−/− plasma, we then induced Fg/vWF−/− platelet aggregation in non-anticoagulated platelet poor plasma (PPP). Surprisingly, robust aggregation occurred after ADP treatment. We further demonstrated that directly triggering the thrombin receptor PAR4 with thrombin receptor activation peptide (TRAP, AYPGKF-NH2) induced platelet aggregation in thrombin-inhibitor treated Fg/vWF−/− PRP and gel-filtered Fg/vWF-platelets in 1mM Ca2+ PIPES buffer. Thus Fg/vWF-independent aggregation can be induced in vitro and both divalent cations and thrombin are required for this novel platelet aggregation pathway. It is likely that ADP induced thrombin generation in Fg/vWF-/- PRP. Considering platelet aggregation has been observed in type I Glanzmann Thrombasthenic patients lacking αIIbβ3 protein, we hypothesized that Fg/vWF−/− platelet aggregation may occur in either a β3 integrin-dependent or β3 integrin independent manners. To test this hypothesis, β3 integrin deficient (β3−/−) platelets were added into the same non-anticoagulated Fg/vWF−/− plasma and no aggregation was observed after ADP treatment. β3−/− platelets also did not co-aggregate with Fg/vWF−/− platelets in vitro in aggregation assays, which were analyzed by flow cytometry with an anti-CD61 (anti-β3 integrin) antibody. Furthermore, when fluorescently labeled β3−/− platelets were injected into Fg/vWF−/− mice, β3−/− platelets did not significantly incorporate into Fg/vWF−/− thrombi under confocal intravital microscopy. The inability of β3−/− platelets to aggregate is not due to a deficiency in other adhesive receptors, since no reduction of GPIbα, β1 integrins, and P-selectin was observed on β3−/− platelets. Thus, although the GPIb complex, P-selectin, and β1 integrins may be involved in platelet aggregation, β3 integrin is essential for this Fg/vWF-independent platelet aggregation pathway. This also indicates that other alternative ligands of β3 integrin from either the plasma or platelet granules are capable of mediating platelet aggregation independent of both Fg and vWF under more physiologically relevant conditions (i.e. non anti-coagulated blood) where divalent cations and thrombin are present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→