Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cilem teto bakalařske prace je statisticky analyzovat vztahy mezi indexem ekonomicke svobody vydane Fraserovým institutem a indexem ekonomicke svobody od Heritage foundation vydane ve spojeni s The Wall Street Journal. Vytyceneho cile se pokusime dosahnout pomoci statistických metod analýzy dat. V prvni casti ukaže teoreticke podklady tvorby obou indexů ekonomicke svobody a jejich vstupni parametry. V casti druhe se pokusi statistickou analýzou prozkoumat vztahy mezi nimi a interpretovat jejich výsledky. Podivame se rovněž na vývoj indexu ekonomicke svobodu u Ceske republiky a jejich sousednich statů Polska, Německa, Rakouska a Slovenska. Tato bakalařska prace by mněla poukazat na rozdilne výsledky u obou výse uvedených indexů, přestože se snaži oba kvantifikovat stejný socio-ekonomický fenomen. V zavěru uvedeme dosažene výsledky a jejich možnou interpretaci.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".