MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2580858099 · doi:10.5539/jpl.v10n2p1

International Bankruptcy with an Emphasis on Trade Bill Approved in 2013

2017· article· en· W2580858099 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Soheyla Kefayati, Mehdi Ashouri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Politics and Law · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Arbitration and Investment Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislatorRegionalism (politics)BankruptcyInternational trade lawInternational lawInternational tradePolitical scienceCommissionEconomicsLaw and economicsLawLegislationPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International bankruptcy has been grown by international trade. It has been created a wide literature about it. It is one of the essential factors to survive in the international trade space. Setting and enacting laws in this regard remarkably will help solve the legal troubles in the case of international trade. The aim of the present research is to investigate international bankruptcy with an emphasis on trade bill approved in 2013. The results show that new bill has somewhat been able to make general regulations and intended fundamental principles in UNCITRAL Model Law considered. It is done with regard to United Nations Commission on International Trade Law regarding borderless bankruptcy. By investigating different articles of the new bill it can be inferred that the tendency of the legislator is towards a theory of regionalism. Although it is somehow adjusted (regionalism based on interactions). The absolute basis of regionalism has been deduced from that. Therefore it could be said that the legislator has somewhat been lead to the theory of regionalism based on international interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Politics and LawSame topicInternational Arbitration and Investment LawFrench-language works237,207