Impact of renal impairment and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on bleomycin-induced pneumonitis (bleo lung), febrile neutropenia (FN), and survival in patients (pts) with germ cell tumor (GCT) treated with chemotherapy (chemo).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
328 Background: Use of GCSF and the development of renal impairment in GCT pts receiving chemo are common, but their effect on toxicity and survival is unclear. This study examines the impact of GCSF and renal impairment on bleo lung, FN and survival, in GCT pts receiving 1st line chemo. Methods: Clinical data from our institutional GCT database was complemented by review of radiology, pharmacy and medical records. All GCT pts receiving 1st line chemo between 1-Jan-00 and 31-Dec-10 were included. Pts receiving at least one GCSF dose were identified. Renal impairment during chemo was defined as any serum creatinine above the institutional upper limit of normal. Bleo lung was graded (G1-5) using CTCAE criteria. FN was defined as temperature ≥38C and neutrophil count <1.0. Results: The cohort consisted of 260 GCT pts, median age 31.5 years, 171 (66%) had IGCCCG good risk disease, 42 (16%) intermediate, and 41 (16%) poor, while 6 (2%) received adjuvant chemo. 159 (61%) received GCSF and 49 (19%) developed renal impairment. 212 (82%) received BEP of which 73 (34%) developed bleo lung (56 pts G1 asymptomatic, 13 pts G2, 4 pts ≥G3). Renal impairment was associated with bleo lung in univariate (OR 2.87, p=0.008) and multivariate (OR 2.69, p=0.01) analyses. GCSF was associated with increasing severity of bleo lung (OR 1.86, p=0.045) but this was not significant in a multivariate analysis (OR 1.72, p=0.08). FN occurred in 33 (13%) of 260 pts. Renal impairment (OR 3.91, p=0.001) was associated with FN. Primary GCSF prophylaxis reduced FN (OR 0.26, p=0.001), however, 8 (7%) of 112 patients developed FN in spite of GCSF prophylaxis. Survival analyses demonstrated GCSF and renal impairment did not impact progression free or overall survival (OS), however, bleo lung was associated with poorer OS in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis (HR 2.85, p=0.029). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate both renal impairment and GCSF are risk factors for bleo lung, while renal impairment itself is also a risk factor for FN. Additionally, we identify bleo lung as a significant poor prognostic factor for OS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".